1freeworld Groups - Print Page


    
      
        1freeworld Groups
        (http://www.1freeworld.net/cgi-bin/Yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        Romance & Relationships >> Love & Relationships >> LOVE or LUST?
        
(Message started by: okasantina on Apr 23^rd, 2004, 12:25pm)

Title: LOVE or LUST?
Post by okasantina on Apr 23^rd, 2004, 12:25pm

People says b4 u fall in love they should feel the lusT First and the love will follow... :o ;D

Other would say Love first and then LuST will follow :o ;D

So which is which????? ::) ??? ::) ???

vote and post awayyyyyyyyyyy ;D ;D ;D

[smiley=icon_dance.gif] [smiley=drummer.gif] [smiley=icon_dance.gif]

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by keensryche on Apr 23^rd, 2004, 4:58pm

Is it possible to hate someone at first site? NO, then how can you love someone at first site.

I believe it's lust. :o

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by mylane on Apr 23^rd, 2004, 11:55pm

well for me, lust should be the first and then next is love...

if love will be the first then theres no way lust will follow....its more on platonic kind of relationship....(in my case)

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by need4speed8dalejr on Jul 19^th, 2004, 12:39am

Yep, Lust first then Love. For me anyways that's the way I see it.

The only time this didn't happen was when I worked with a gal and I fell in love with her over a 6 month time span, but because we didn't fool around right away, love came first, then lust.

But I guess if you were in Prison...well...that would also be another way to hold off on the lust. [smiley=cool4.gif]

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by gracia on Aug 2^nd, 2004, 3:51am

hmm...i prefer a lil physical attraction at first...and love will follow....its difficult to stay in a relationship if both partners are not physically attracted with each other.

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by Stonser on Aug 3^rd, 2004, 7:16am

It has to be lust first. I don't beleive in love at first sight. Lust at first sight yes. You cannot love someone, in my opinion, without getting to know them a little.

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by Fallen on Nov 14^th, 2005, 8:37pm

Ill take both is that ok tina????????????

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by okasantina on Nov 17^th, 2005, 5:20pm

on 11/14/05 at 20:37:40, Fallen wrote:

Ill take both is that ok tina????????????

:o How can u take both? is that possible? i dont think so ::)

It seems that everyone says its lust first eh...so its premarital sex b4 marriage is that it? ::)

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by Fallen on Dec 6^th, 2005, 8:32pm

Love moves in mysterious ways and im sure u can have them both love and lust want me to show u how? ;)

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by okasantina on Dec 6^th, 2005, 8:57pm

on 12/06/05 at 20:32:27, Fallen wrote:

Love moves in mysterious ways and im sure u can have them both love and lust want me to show u how? ;)

How? ::) ::) I know that is a song eh ;D

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by Fallen on Dec 6^th, 2005, 9:09pm

Ill sing it to u hahahahaha :D

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by okasantina on Dec 6^th, 2005, 9:16pm

on 12/06/05 at 21:09:44, Fallen wrote:

Ill sing it to u hahahahaha :D

LMAO! haahahahah

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by nelson3082000 on Dec 7^th, 2005, 12:05am

lust me up baby for sure

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by okasantina on Jan 15^th, 2006, 6:05am

on 12/07/05 at 00:05:51, nelson3082000 wrote:

lust me up baby for sure

[smiley=icon_dance.gif] [smiley=icon_dance.gif] [smiley=icon_dance.gif]

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by mixin4livin on Feb 5^th, 2006, 5:41am

Bothe please!

Title: Re: LOVE or LUST?
Post by somebody on Feb 25^th, 2006, 9:44am

There is no such thing as love at first sight period. People confuse love and lust with each other too much.