|
||
|
Title: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Jul 27th, 2005, 12:02pm You don't want GMA coz she's a cheat and greedy. You don't want any from the opposition because what...just because... who do you want to be the head of this country? |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Jul 27th, 2005, 12:43pm Cant argue here...im still for GMA, sorry earthy :P |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Forgettable on Jul 27th, 2005, 1:25pm on 07/27/05 at 12:02:08, earthlingorgeous wrote:
If I have gotten a better one, why do I still need to gamble my luck to the one I don't know what he really stands for? And don't tell me that what I currently have, is not a "better one". |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Jul 28th, 2005, 3:56am on 07/27/05 at 13:25:51, Forgettable wrote:
Cant argue with you on that one, Krissy ;D. go tell ;em! ;) |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by gracia on Jul 29th, 2005, 10:43am definitely not me [smiley=wall.gif]coz it's obvious that I am brainless...anyway....i'll favor for Gloria at the moment, it's quite risky if she'll step down without no one in particular to replace her. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Forgettable on Jul 31st, 2005, 7:13am on 07/28/05 at 03:56:18, Wicked_Witch wrote:
You really can't argue with ME,but you can say whatever you wanna say wether you agree with my post or not. Defend yours by the best way you can,just don't mention my name with your post.I don't like it. [smiley=catsmiley.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Jul 31st, 2005, 8:31am Before i reply to the one posted before me, I wanna know first if this is really Unforgettable herself. Im kinda confused here. Will someone enlighten me pls? |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Jul 31st, 2005, 8:47am on 07/31/05 at 07:13:39, Forgettable wrote:
Oppss...im sorry about mentioning your name here. What's the big deal, anyway? You should have told me I cant. And who the hell sez I cant argue with YOU? I will argue with anyone I want to argue with if my opinion is different from that person. Afterall, isnt that what this topic is all about? I just happen to be on the same side as you and what you posted is the same thing I want to say? Cant I simply said what I posted about it? And by the way, that was uncalled for, what are you trying to prove anyway? Ok....I got it on good authority that its really her. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Forgettable on Jul 31st, 2005, 9:29am on 07/31/05 at 08:47:46, Wicked_Witch wrote:
No one uses my user name but me. I only meant, you really can't argue with me,although, I knew you're with my statement.And I said that, however, you can post any idea of yours to argue or agree with what I have posted and NOT with ME, since this is not the first time you mentioned my name with your post. I think I understood your reply to me ,I don't know if you had with mine. But I am sure I didn't mean to hurt you there.We maybe only talk differently,or do I need to use smileys like ;D , ;), :), :-* to show I'm OK or I'm happy while replying? Nevertheless, I'm so sorry if I was being misunderstood. Please accept my treat ;) [smiley=cat36.gif] [smiley=icon_drink2.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Jul 31st, 2005, 6:28pm back to the topic guys! As for me, I have already answer this question in the Hello Garci thread. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Aug 1st, 2005, 1:57am on 07/31/05 at 09:29:47, Forgettable wrote:
That's all I need from you. Apology accepted. Forget it ever happened. And please, next time when I have done something you dont like, pls dont make it public like this. We have each other on our buddy list. You can always tell me, if you're having problem with me, ok? |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Aug 1st, 2005, 10:09am I dont want GMA but i dont want the other options too so as long as theres no one else better i'd rather stick to GMA ;) Aw n pls stick to the topic ppl... No need to get personal or anything ;) |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by chelle on Aug 1st, 2005, 7:56pm GMA will u pls arise=)) put ur hands in the air and say weeehooooo\:D/ say ohhhh ohhhh,,,,,,,, hahahah sory u guys im here again i guess;)) |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Aug 2nd, 2005, 3:32am Actually I have someone I think would be good....but he's not involve. I think Dong Puno will make a good leader. He's tough and he's straight..yet ;D |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Aug 5th, 2005, 11:18am on 07/27/05 at 12:02:08, earthlingorgeous wrote:
Hyphothetically, We can get one of those janitors/taxidrivers/security guards who returned bags of money to their rightful owners, educate them with basic management and finance skills and polish their pronouncation and we got ourselves a leader ;D |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Aug 5th, 2005, 11:22am on 07/27/05 at 13:25:51, Forgettable wrote:
If Gloria is the better one then we are hopeless. We might as well happily ask the chinese, koreans or the americans to nuke us and put us out of our misery. I still think that majority of filipinos have honor. I admit that there are rotten apples, and these rotten apples are the ones who are surviving in our political climate. But I believe they do not represent the filipino people as a whole. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Aug 6th, 2005, 3:43am on 08/05/05 at 11:18:01, mylane wrote:
You forgot it takes a lot of money to get involved in Politics. :PSome even bought their way in, talents or not. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Aug 19th, 2005, 8:56am I made a tread thats so mind boggling lol!!! Even I now don't know who should better sit in that position...its a popularity contest on the other hand and on the other hand its a sensitive issue... but all i wan't, all we want I guess is the truth...did she or did she not rigged the last election? if yes...thats a big no no no for a leader thats not a good start...we forgive and forget? people forget easily but if we allow a nations leader to sit and admit he/she cheated then now...election would be phony ... better yet lets have dictatorship...or maybe a king like in Thailand ... Hmmmmmm.... I think the best President this country had was Marcos. I still remember when... I can buy my merienda for 25cents theres 3 25cents phone call a dollar is only 18 pesos |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Aug 24th, 2005, 7:41am Hmmmm... so what do you think now about the 60/40 share of power... admin/opposition... huh... if she isn't really guilty of lying, cheating and corruption why is she doing all this stunt. 1) she went to the anniversary of Ninoy's funeral service... dang we can all see that she's being a fake and that nobody there wants her presence ... but they are just being civilized... anyhow she is still the president. 2) why go on the trouble of reconcilling with Erap with Bro. Mike Velarde as the mediator... also offering recognizance to the not yet proven guilty Erap... 3) now this 60/40 thingy 4) if she is not really guilty why make the impeachment complaint proceed...don't need to buy people or so... (i know a juicy story about bribes and all for the media people too) But true I can't see anyone better fitted to be the President... GMA got the guts... I commend her for that... she should however first get all the money stolen back where it belong... do as she promised in the 10 point agenda and her SONA... and maybe try to make some good things visible... like how Marcos did during his time... |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Aug 25th, 2005, 2:04am I think GMA or her advisers thought she should be there at Ninoy's anniversary coz it's her duty as a President. Afterall, she's not involved in his assasination.And I bet she didn't wanna be there herself. ;D As for Marcos, I have always said that he was one hell of a President for making things done right after he issued them, and rightly so. Trouble was, he got blinded by too much power and greed. Otherwise, he might yet be the best President we could ever have had. As for GMA, guilty or not, I think she is trying to atone for whatever mess she created making that ill-fated phone calls.The administration knows that her fate lies in the balance now. And as long as there's no one else qualifed for the job, I'd still cast my vote on GMA. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Aug 25th, 2005, 9:16am To be a leader you must have the will, the guts and the feel...GMA got it all...oh btw...did ya know she is willing to step down on 2007... But well...lets all wait on Tuesday or until Wednesday if the impeachment complaint will proceed or will be killed ... the problem is I see big trouble coming... |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Aug 26th, 2005, 7:27am Ok so have we found someone else to replace GMA? Dont get me wrong. I dont liek GMA to be my president. She is just an "Elitistang Burgis" if you ask me. She doesnt know how to mingle witht he ppl because she thinks she is above and better than anyone else... But the thing is, i dont like the others as well. In my opinion, Lacson is a Liar and a harsh killer, Religious leader have no place in politics (separation of church and government), FPJ (may he rest in peace)is a kind hearted man with good intentions but he was not cut to be a politician... If not GMA then who? Well heck i'd vote for Bayani Fernando as president but i know that he is still not ripe for the picking ;D |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Aug 29th, 2005, 9:33am on 08/26/05 at 07:27:38, kim wrote:
huh...so if every policeman who do their duties...killed a suspect during a hot pursuit be labelled as a killer?...are u talking about the kuratong baleleng re Lacson? ... check ur notes pls...lol... Liar...hmmmm...lets define that? Anyway...Bayani Fernando...yes he is not yet ripe...But I wish for a new blood though... |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Aug 30th, 2005, 3:08am Humnnn...my witchy instinct is telling me Lacson is trouble with a capital T. Let's give Bayani a few more years to hone his skills ;)Hey, Dong Puno is a great man, I think. I hope he has political ambitions though. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Aug 30th, 2005, 10:19am yes earthy i am pertaining to the curatong baleleng which is one of his popular acts. Not to mention the others that was not published in the news papers.... N i called him a liar because he cheated too in the elections... I'd jump off marikina bridge is he can prove to me that he didnt cheat too. :P But if he was your presidential bet i'm sowie for offending you if i did. ;) Dong Puno is a good man i think. I havent seen or heard anything that he has done wrong so far. Thats the same reason why i voted for Loren legarda the first time she ran for senator. I was so optimistic about her and i believed in what she stands for but for some reason she made a 160 turn n now she's rotten as hell :P... This probably proves the saying "put one good tomato in a basket of rotten ones n it will get rotten too" |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 7th, 2005, 9:51am there it goes.... so the impeachment complaint was junked.... but but but but...she hasn't answered all the allegations thrown against her like the cheating in the 2004 elections and the "habitual lying" the juetengate scandal, the gloria macapagal highway and so on and so fort.... GMA will go to the US for the UN assembly in new york to represent the country and present to the UN panel the Philippine situation... i don't think she should do it...what would she present... that she is clear of the allegations against her? not! so the senate will revive its hearings against all the above mentioned scandals when it resumes session on september 19. meanwhile...the oppositions, who are now "united" again for the nth time calls again for the oust of the Philippine president. storm of rallies now are held simulataneously in the historical mendiola and edsa...but but but...the main element like the military have not joined in yet. so...the opposition says after gma will be ousted a caretaker goverment will succeeed...because they do not believe in the constitutional successor...noli de castro... so...still...the question lingers.... who???? [smiley=wall.gif] DA WHO??? [smiley=wall.gif] hmmmm... maybe our little kids should be the countries leader... lets ask them... and when i say little i mean our pre-schoolers lol! [smiley=huepfenicon111.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Sep 7th, 2005, 6:05pm I have been watching news about this impeachment saga since it has been the talked of the whole country. These are my opinions why impeachment have been junked. 1. The PRO administration congressmen knows that once the impeachment reaches the SENATE, it would be hard or difficult for them to SAVE Arroyo BECAUSE they don’t have that NUMBERS in the senate. They are in the position to impose their strength in numbers in the congress so why not use it as early as possible? 2. Many of those congressmen are affected in that Garci tapes and if the impeachment will push through it will OPEN a can of worms that will accuse their fellow conspirators so they rather kill the impeachment as soon as possible before it multiplies and break or destroy them all. 3. Most of those congressmen's relatives or either close friends were given a good position BY GMA so in return or payback they are making sure that she will not be impeach. 4. Talking about the Estrada's impeachment experienced, the senators will most likely vote with the sentiments of the people and not along party lines. In other words, it is easier to persuade senators to convict Gloria just to appease the public. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Sep 7th, 2005, 6:17pm on 09/07/05 at 09:51:43, earthlingorgeous wrote:
If Gloria is really innocent, She should let them impeach her to prove and clean her name and reputation not just a President of the country but as person, THAT if she is not hiding anything. Sad but its true what happened in the congress is just a numbers games and a political process just like those anti-impeachment congressmen was saying. Numbers game because those congressmen make sure that their number will come out the victory in the process. Numbers game because those congressmen see to it that their number will continue to dominate Congress to favor GMA. Political process because those congressmen know that their political future as well as the political future of their minions and fellow conspirators will largely depends in the success or failure of the impeachment process. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Sep 8th, 2005, 2:05am I think it's no longer a question of wether she's guilty or not. They are no longer interested in finding out the truth. I bet if they cant find her guilty they would find yet another ax to grind her with. They simply want her OUT, period. I think a lot just want to protect something of their own.They know they have a lot to lose if she retains the presidency. So the race is on. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 8th, 2005, 11:02am That is so sad isn't it... people here in the country are just forced to good to take what they are given.... and this rally thingy being organize will not really succeed because the people are already tired of this... ... So sad that we are just forced to good.... sigh |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Sep 15th, 2005, 9:07am there is no doubt that GMA cheated during the elections n so did all the other candidates. THe country doesnt need a SUPER HERO. Because he or she doesnt exist. IF you take out GMA the one taking her place will be the same or even worst. Why? because the people responsible for putting him/her in power are all the same ppl who has been doing the same old shit time in memorial. People power only worked ones. ALl the rest are but just politicians taking advantage of our anger to benifit themselves. Transitional government proposes a group of dedicated and honest YOUNG ppl who are smart (even if he is not an honor studen because theres a difference between being smart and being intelligent )enough to lead the country. IT is not about putting the power in one person's hand but a group of ppl. Take out all the TRAPO and all the corrupt. Our country will only be able to recover if we start with a cleen slate. Take out GMA, LACSON, DE CASTRO, ENRILE, JDV, RAMOS, ERAP, LEGARDA, DEFENSOR and all the others. Remove the senate and congress since they just waste our money in paying for there hoars... but how to make this idea into i reality? i dont know. i dont have the answers... If FPJ ran for president with a different group i would have voted for him, HE has the heart and the sincerity to be a good leader but all the people behind him are those people who has made our lives worst. Traditional politician who became millionares with out money... I could go on n on ranting about how the government is soooo bad but then i'd just end up being in a bad mood. I dont hate my country. I love it with all my heart. I just hate the people who turn it into junk |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 15th, 2005, 11:05am on 09/15/05 at 09:07:10, kim wrote:
i could agree more with you on that kimmy....i love my country but the people running it i hate .... |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Sep 16th, 2005, 2:09am GMA heading the UN Council, what do you say to that? I still think she's the best choice we got right now :) |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 16th, 2005, 11:28am on 09/16/05 at 02:09:28, Wicked_Witch wrote:
FORCED TO GOOD! I wonder how she could sit there in the UN council and say the Philippines economy is strong ... damn.... Philippines economy is good for her side only and on her side only .... she's damn so shameless and thick skinned to say that to the world... and now another blundder she did .... WHAT THE HELL was she thinking about letting Norberto Gonzalez enter into a contract with a US lobby firm to be a consultant on 1) Philippine defense and 2) Charter Change.....damn....did you know how much that contract was $75 thousand a month. Where the hell will we get that money...damn...she is making us all stupid saying that the money to pay that consulting firm will come from donations ... to hell with that... donations!!! If there are good samaritans like that willingly to shell out money to pay a foreign law firm to help us ammend our COnstitution...why for another better cause than that ... find donors to pay-out our FOREIGN DEBT! .... Sorry I am really exploding with this issue...how could she do that!!! $75,000 a month...can't she see whats happening in the grassroots... For her own glory GMA went to the UN council meeting ...but on her back people know ... what a shame for our country... I just hope she make good all the promises she said on her SONA...and after the impeachment complaint against her was junked. Or else all the congressmen she promised good fortunes will run after her and Karma will struck her ... how many more betrayals to the Filipino GMA will do... she is making us all stupid, brainless, idiots!!! I hope GMA will come to realize what he has done and what she did and what she's doing and walk away with pride still. Yes I am proud of her achievements...I applaud her for being so strong willed determined woman...she emanates how women can be really powerful and no men can stand on her way if she will. The contract they entered with a foreign firm really bugged me a lot, very much. and the excuses made by her cabinet secretaries makes me puke some more....damn...see how they talk... is this how stupid they think the Filipino's are now! |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 21st, 2005, 10:15am At last...they noticed....well the senators atleast.... they are insulting the imagination and intelligence of not just the Senate but all the Filipino's in the world... NSC Sec Bert Gonzalez...clean up your act... can you see your having high blood pressure now... he had 160/90 blood pressure... he is lying ... and he is protecting whoever... simple questions like; 1) who are the donors that willingly shell out P12 million for a lobbyist? 2) who refered veneble to you? 3) are you authorized to sign the contract by the president? he answered: 1)"I am sorry ... for my own sake... I am not able to reveal who the donors are... I will have to clarify this to the president... give me a few days". 2)"I am not prepared to say right now" 3)"I was only given a verbal authority to go ahead". DANG, we are not stoopid....the senators you are talking to are not...you will answer or you will cited for contempt! >:( anti arroyo groups have converged all over metro manila particularly here in ayala avenue makati and paseo de roxas. there are also groups in mediola and welcome rotonda. it's commemoration of the martial law declaration today too. how and when will the saga end? i don't know its a mystery. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by mylane on Sep 24th, 2005, 3:27pm Sec. Gonzales failed or voluntarily refused to answer questions from the senators regarding the details of and his participation in the Venable contracts. Hmmmm...interesting... lets wait for more news about this issue...or they might kill the venable issue like they did to the impeachment. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 26th, 2005, 8:45am yup... they are trying to kill the veneble issue by making bert gonzalez incapacitated to tell the truth.... right now they want to have an operation on him because of his alleged heart failure to which sen. pimentel said he wants some other entity to have a second opinion on him... [smiley=detective.gif] if my sensor (lol) is serving me right they want to mum him for good, operate him and ohno what a creative imagination I have, have him killed or proclaimed dead because of the failure of the operation :o oh no!!! if I were bert gonzalez, I will tell now,before they kill me lol! God Speed! |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Sep 28th, 2005, 12:03pm Dang dang dang ... Today...a military officer assigned in Lanao del Sur (Mindanao) was invited to the Senate to give light to the issue re the Hello Garci tapes. It was Gen.Gudane and Maj. Balutan...they revealed the massive election fraud orchestrated there... But a few hours before the two are to speak before the Senate our very good president Arroyo issued a memorandum restraining them to go to senate...thats E.O.464 ..."no govt. official may be allowed to speak before Congress for any inquiry in aid of legislation without my approval" :o duh!!! before that...a few days ago, PGMA issued an order the comprehensive pre-emptive response (CPR) or the ban on protest and rallies Then over the weekend a pronouncement (that was refuted yesterday) by the Sec. of Justice that there will be an overtake of public utilities by the government :o Creepy creepy...signs of the creeping martial law about to take place.... |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Sep 30th, 2005, 2:06am Humnn...I think the game now is survival of the fittest. And contrary to some beliefs, Im not pro-GMA (not changing colors either :P). My point is I find no one better than GMA so I think she's the lesser of two or more evils ;)If she declares Martial Law, there's gonna be more trouble. And it's because the opposition is forcing her to play her last cards. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Dec 28th, 2005, 11:50am haaaaaaaay... witchy I am saddened by the issue... see even me I surrendered... GMA is a stubborn person... jeeez the power of a woman lol! Lets just pray that next admin will do good... God bless us all ! |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Dec 29th, 2005, 7:48am Hehehehe! See how she's still holding court after all the fiasco's? Told 'ya..she has guts! [smiley=roll.gif] [smiley=roll.gif] [smiley=roll.gif] |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Dec 29th, 2005, 8:23am yeah... women's wit and charm... she is good i must say... the oppositions is going nowhere so we might just stick with her ::) jeeeeeeez ... forced to good as I always say lol |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Jan 10th, 2006, 9:00am I dont get it really... in 2003-2004 the senaors spent all our money investigation on a bunch of alleged corruptions in the government. Not to mention our very popularized Miss Kiana Reeves whom the senate spent thousands if not millions just to find out who among them are lying. Everytime they hear about corruption or ghost projects or other things its as if their whole world falls apart. I mean COME ON!!!! All those damnsenators accusing each other and accusing the president are doing the same thing too!!! Its a cycle that our system of government has fallen into. During elections you get rich ppl to finance your campaign and if thats not enough you use the tax money to your own advantage. Then if you win, you now have an "utang na loob" to all those who gave you money so you are obligated to put them in ofice or to give them projects instead of going though a bidding. Then you steal from the government funds to pay back all teh money you used up just to win the elections. Who among the pesidential candidates did these? ALL OF THEM!!!! WHats happening is that the guilty who is pretending to be innocent is accusing the other one who is as equally guilty as the rest. Instead of using up all the millions in endless investigations why not use it in a more productive way? THe question still remains... who is the better choice than GMA? Dakdak sila ng dakdak eh di naman sila nagkakaisa kung sino gusto nilang ipalit :( ::) |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Jan 11th, 2006, 6:49am Here it goes... It seems former President Fidel V. Ramos is at it again.... He will now pressure President GMA to step down by July 2007 as what she promised waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back during the election time.... Aside from the elephant projects and the lavish expenditures during Ramos time I could say he did good during his time ... the economy was somehow stable... Now the question is... is FVR the one? :o hmmmmmmmmmmm |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Jan 11th, 2006, 2:48pm I find it very amusing how Imee Marcos and FVR's camp throw insults at each other's person. Sheez... kids!!..are they really the officials we need to make this country a better place to live in? How boring! |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by earthlingorgeous on Feb 7th, 2006, 9:07am ;D Have you heard, there's a meeting of Erap, Cory, Susan and FVR .... hmmmmm.... ;D Whatever! I hope they do something good or are cooking something real great for the country! |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by kim on Feb 27th, 2006, 8:51am This thread has been going on for a while now and it is very much disturbing that we havent actually found someone better to take the palce of GMA. According to the constitution, if GMA steps down then Noli will take over. Is he a better choice that GMA? Or are we going to waste billions again to make sure that Noli doesnt take the presidency... And when you take away Noli the next person in line would be Drilon since he is the senate president. Is he any better than GMA? As a common citizen of this over abused country, What i fears me most about politics is the fact that we have been abused and is continuosly being abused by the same ppl who have been doing it for ages. I am not a very religious person but i love i when cardinal sin said " in edsa 1 we drove away Ali Baba but the 40 thieves took over" I am not a die hard GMA fan. I know that our country deserves someone better but unless they give me a solid answer as to whom they want to replace GMA and if they convince me that that person would do better than GMA then i'd rather not join them in any protest or moce to make GMA resign. |
||
|
Title: Re: Not GMA not any from opposition -- Then WHO? Post by Wicked_Witch on Mar 3rd, 2006, 1:52am Actually the most logical choice in terms of leadership would be Fidel V. Ramos, he has the background and the best experience leading the country. The question though is, are his motives any better than the previous leader? Noli is not a good choice I think because I am sure he will be eaten alive by the bureaucracy. And Drillon is well...another wanna be and the least popular among the choices we have. |
||
|
1freeworld Groups » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.2! YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved. |